search

mdmintz / pynose

pynose fixes nose to extend unittest and make testing easier
https://pypi.org/project/pynose/
GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
11 stars 6 forks source link

Import AUTHORS from nose #31

Closed astatide closed 2 months ago

astatide commented 2 months ago

The following PR adds the original AUTHORS file from the nose repository, ensuring proper attribution is given.

emilazy commented 2 months ago

Could you add Michael Mintz and Christian Clauss so that this has a more complete list of contributors/copyright holders?

astatide commented 2 months ago

Hmmm, in that case, it might be better to move this up a directory (as it is, I just tried to pull it into the original location of the AUTHORS file from the nose directory).

emilazy commented 2 months ago

It’s in the root of the upstream nose repository, too, not the nose subdirectory both share, so I think that placement with the rest of the meta files rather than the Python source directory makes more sense.

astatide commented 2 months ago

Ah, I thought the subdirectory they shared was a little different. However, I think even if that were the case, it makes more sense to have it in the root and with all authors. Thank you for the suggestion!

mdmintz commented 2 months ago

Do we know why "John Szakmeister" is missing from the original AUTHORS file? He was a major contributor to the original nose. (A few other missing too. I'm looking into it)

mdmintz commented 2 months ago

Take a look at https://github.com/mdmintz/pynose/pull/32 (I added missing authors, reordered a bit based on lines of code)

mdmintz commented 2 months ago

Completed in https://github.com/mdmintz/pynose/pull/32 Now there are 38 authors listed, including some ones that were missing in https://github.com/nose-devs/nose/blob/master/AUTHORS

astatide commented 2 months ago

Look, I’ll be honest with you. I opened this PR because you complained you were busy and had a lot of things to take care of, and I wanted to provide a way for you to make it look like you weren’t just trying to make it look like you did all the work on this project. So your response of opening a second PR that’s a slightly modified version of this, merging yours, and closing this? Really makes it look like you’re doing exactly that.

Sure, it took me less than 30 seconds to make this PR and I have no interest in actually contributing to your project, but you claimed you were busy and this was too much work so I took a proactive helpful approach.

Making a separate PR that your GitHub history gets credit for (your GitHub history already has credit for the massive commit/PR you did with the nose project here) is literally the exact behavior you should be avoiding and that you claimed you weren’t doing.