Closed Ptitet closed 3 weeks ago
Thank you. Most of the code block types are pretty easy to guess, but pug is not, unless you already know Express. So yes, inconsistent, but really, does this inconsistency harm anyone? I'd be OK with removing the links, because people can search. But not really worth the effort IMO.
I'll leave open, but unless someone strongly disagrees with good reasons we should close this.
I agree. We made a judgment call of which languages are "well-known" and which are not.
I think there is a consistency problem on this page : https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/MDN/Writing_guidelines/Howto/Markdown_in_MDN#example_code_blocks
There is a list of supported info strings for code blocks in Markdown, and for the
pug
string, there are two links to Pug and Express.js documentation. There is no link for all the other info strings, so that's a bit strange.What should be done according to me
Remove the links to the documentation for the pug info strings or add link to the documentations for the other items.