improvements on glossary links in see-also

[PassionPenguin]

Background

Currently glossary links are mixed in different formats. Label of such links can be improved for:

• in non-glossary entries, to specify that links in the list are points to Glossary pages, rather than Guides or References.
• in glossary entries, to clarify that links are points to Related terms (against the current glossary page or Glossary mainpage)
• link to /docs/Glossary itself is indeed unnecessary

Related suggestions

@dipikabh recommends to make the label of all these glossary links more readable (i.e. Glossary => Related glossary terms):

Fair enough point about listing the terms. What do you think about preceding the list with a phrase ending in colon, such as "Related glossary terms:". It's a nuance but might be helpful instead of just saying "Glossary".

- Related glossary terms:
  - {{Glossary("Term1")}}
  - {{Glossary("Term2")}}

• We need to qualify "Glossary" slightly considering we're already on a glossary page.
• It would be nice to say upfront before the list that the links are glossary terms and not guide or reference pages (so not the last suggestion).

_Originally posted by @dipikabh in https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/34165#discussion_r1655241066 and https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/34095#issuecomment-2194523190_

@bsmth recommends to remove the link of the label (i.e. link points to /docs/Glossary)> > This can be merged. Keeping it open for a short time in case we want to apply changes similar to #34165.

Thanks a lot! I also think the changes look good, with one comment that I think linking to /Glossary is not necessary, so I would just prefer to do this:

- Glossary
  - {{Glossary("Term1")}}
  - {{Glossary("Term2")}}

Or indeed

- {{Glossary("Term1")}}
- {{Glossary("Term2")}}

Originally posted by @bsmth in https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/34095#issuecomment-2194168271

### Tasks
- [ ] https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/34454

[dipikabh]

Thanks @PassionPenguin for opening the issue and the PR to resolve the inconsistencies. Brian and I will discuss the style to adopt for the glossary terms in "See also" and will get back to you on the PR.

Thanks for your efforts!