Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?
The paper lists all three authors with equal contributions, but only the first author has a significant commit history.
Could you clarify the authors' contributions (which can of course also be equal without equal commit history)?
I'd recommend a contribution statement at the end of the manuscript, ideally following the CREDiT Taxonomy.
While you are at it, please also add the university name(s) to your affiliations.
Thank you for the feedback. I added a contribution statement, d952b0f30f2cacd865c7a81cc2810a363e368aaf, and the university affiliations, 8abb94bc2ddc9b46954f2dd75c6f2e45b9107b25
From the review checklist:
The paper lists all three authors with equal contributions, but only the first author has a significant commit history.
Could you clarify the authors' contributions (which can of course also be equal without equal commit history)? I'd recommend a contribution statement at the end of the manuscript, ideally following the CREDiT Taxonomy.
While you are at it, please also add the university name(s) to your affiliations.
https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7212