Testing verify that all class members are set correctly for a particular instance

[mobasherswl]

The example class is given below. See setName method, where the value passed is set to both class members. The unit test passes without any error. Am I missing something?

`public class User { private String name; private String title;

public String getName() {
    return name;
}

public String getTitle() {
    return title;
}

public void setTitle(String title) {
    this.title = title;
}

public void setName(String name) {
    this.name=name;
    title=name;
}

@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
    if (this == o) return true;
    if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
    User user = (User) o;
    return Objects.equals(name, user.name) &&
            Objects.equals(title, user.title);
}

@Override
public int hashCode() {
    return Objects.hash(name, title);
}

@Override
public String toString() {
    return "User{" +
            "name='" + name + '\'' +
            ", title='" + title + '\'' +
            '}';
}

}`

[meanbeanlib]

Bean verification checks that a call to Foo setter results in a change visible from Foo getter:

setFoo(xyz)
xyz.equals(getFoo())

It does not check if a call to Foo setter might result in a change to another property:

setFoo(xyz)
!xyz.equals(getBar()) ??

It's easy to see though why users might want the library to detect such likely unintended behavior. An improvement will be made to the library to detect it.

Thanks for reporting.

[meanbeanlib]

With 3.0.0-m6 release, such a bean should be detected.

[meanbeanlib]

Please give that a try.

Gitter chat was also created as another venue for asking questions.