Open mrjones-plip opened 2 years ago
cc:
@mrjones-plip I think so, I still have about 2 weeks. Will look at that early next week once 3.14 is out of the door.
@mrjones-plip Just added some notes to the documentation and got @garethbowen to review. He suggested we find ways to make results from performance testing public. QA will figure this out later, so leaving this ticket open for reference.
Nice work on this @ngaruko !
I was chatting with App Services about how our release and acceptance testing works. After reviewing our dev workflow page for code, I saw that these two topics are poorly represented.
We should foster confidence in how the product team does it's QA by publishing the steps we follow. I believe there's maybe some internal documentation we could use that doesn't need much refining to publish? This could either represent the process at a high level to amend to the Development Workflow page, or the entire process which then could be the document QA uses instead of the internal one.