Open hubertgabrys opened 2 months ago
Good idea, but I would say:
Selecting 2D would extract:
2D averaged 2D slice-merged 2.5D direction-merged 2.5D merged
Selecting 3D would extract:
3D averaged 3D merged
As 2.5D is still based on slice-derived 2D features and not a 3D vol.
Let's follow the naming convention from IBSI: https://github.com/theibsi/ibsi_1_data_analysis/blob/4feb75e02c154b295fcee7def0dc70e47b176e6e/naming_tables/20190830.xlsx
We could reduce the texture aggregation choices to 2D and 3D.
Selecting 2D would extract:
Selecting 3D would extract: