Closed meejah closed 7 years ago
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #207 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.88% 99.88% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 18 19 +1
Lines 3374 3485 +111
==========================================
+ Hits 3370 3481 +111
Misses 4 4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
txtorcon/torstate.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
txtorcon/web.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
txtorcon/endpoints.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
txtorcon/socks.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
txtorcon/circuit.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
txtorcon/util.py | 98.12% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
txtorcon/attacher.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
txtorcon/interface.py | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:white_check_mark: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 994c594...3abfdfd. Read the comment docs.
has @coveralls lost its mind?
Merge the new "put a stream on a specific circuit" APIs from
release-1.x
which basically side-steps theset_attacher
stuff.New code (that's not on release-1.x) and is required:
After the doc changes are merged, they should be upgraded to discuss all the issues with attachment (that is that Tor doesn't deal properly with > 1 controller being an attacher).