Closed ywmoyue closed 12 months ago
Thanks for your contribution, @ywmoyue! Please make sure you sign our CLA, as it's a required step before we can merge this.
Thanks for your contribution, @ywmoyue! Please make sure you sign our CLA, as it's a required step before we can merge this.
I have signed
@lminiero Thank you very much for your review. I will revise and self-test and submit the code again next week.
@lminiero I have accepted your comments and made the changes, can you please review this PR again?
@lminiero Thanks for the review again. I have accepted your comments and made the changes.
Thanks! I'll see if I can test this somehow.
I fixed the two errors, can you please check again
Thanks, merging then! :+1:
@ywmoyue, I'm curious about the choice to set a hardcoded payload type of 101
for the telephone-event
RTP payload format. According to RFC2833, this type is typically assigned dynamically. Could you elucidate the reasons for opting for a hardcoded value instead of retrieving the actual payload type dynamically from the SDP?
My concern stems from potential compatibility issues, such as with SIP calls initiated by the Janus SIP plugin. It appears that the WebRTC library used by browsers uses different (and currently hardcoded) payload types for telephone-event
, which could lead to functional mismatches.
@ycherniavskyi Yes, you are right to concern
The reason why I use 101 as the telephone-event payload is that the terminals I tested here use 101 as the telephone-event payload by default, except for webrtc, including yealink phone, linphone, real android phone with VOLTE, and others soft phone
The correct way is indeed to get the telephone-event payload value from sdp, I will see if I can submit a PR to fix this later
Implement the features proposed by jkmchinese from https://janus.discourse.group/t/audiobridge-with-sip-participants/131/7
this PR get rfc2833 data from rtp stream and assemble a sip-info event push to user