Open jlfranklin opened 8 years ago
This is something that could be done in a way similar to how we currently check the archive against a checksum, however the main problem as far as I am concerned is having the tools it depends on to verify the signatures. This might be OK if you have openssl installed for instance, but for a lot of the platforms I try to support that's not a safe assumption.
However if that is something that would work in your own environment, I'd be open to add this kind of feature.
It should be easy enough to use which gpg
or which openssl
to check for the supporting tool and emit an error or warning if requested but not found.
+1
Any update on this? This would be useful for my case too !
@megastep is there any update on the matter ?
I see there is support for encrypting an archive with gpg or ssl, but I would like to add on a digital signature that the script verifies before unpacking.