Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Original comment by sdh...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2011 at 5:40
The libcoap codes are according to coap-03. Olaf is working on an update to
coap-08. At the moment we don't plan to include that for the release.
The patch has the following codes:
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_100 32 /* 100 Continue */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_200 64 /* 200 OK */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_201 65 /* 201 Created */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_304 100 /* 304 Not Modified */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_400 128 /* 400 Bad Request */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_404 132 /* 404 Not Found */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_405 133 /* 405 Method Not Allowed */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_415 143 /* 415 Unsupported Media Type */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_500 160 /* 500 Internal Server Error */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_503 163 /* 503 Service Unavailable */
+#define COAP_RESPONSE_504 164 /* 504 Gateway Timeout */
which is different from what coap-08 specifies:
+------+-------------------------------+-----------+
| Code | Description | Reference |
+------+-------------------------------+-----------+
| 65 | 2.01 Created | [RFCXXXX] |
| 66 | 2.02 Deleted | [RFCXXXX] |
| 67 | 2.03 Valid | [RFCXXXX] |
| 68 | 2.04 Changed | [RFCXXXX] |
| 69 | 2.05 Content | [RFCXXXX] |
| 128 | 4.00 Bad Request | [RFCXXXX] |
| 129 | 4.01 Unauthorized | [RFCXXXX] |
| 130 | 4.02 Bad Option | [RFCXXXX] |
| 131 | 4.03 Forbidden | [RFCXXXX] |
| 132 | 4.04 Not Found | [RFCXXXX] |
| 133 | 4.05 Method Not Allowed | [RFCXXXX] |
| 134 | 4.06 Not Acceptable | [RFCXXXX] |
| 140 | 4.12 Precondition Failed | [RFCXXXX] |
| 141 | 4.13 Request Entity Too Large | [RFCXXXX] |
| 143 | 4.15 Unsupported Media Type | [RFCXXXX] |
| 160 | 5.00 Internal Server Error | [RFCXXXX] |
| 161 | 5.01 Not Implemented | [RFCXXXX] |
| 162 | 5.02 Bad Gateway | [RFCXXXX] |
| 163 | 5.03 Service Unavailable | [RFCXXXX] |
| 164 | 5.04 Gateway Timeout | [RFCXXXX] |
| 165 | 5.05 Proxying Not Supported | [RFCXXXX] |
+------+-------------------------------+-----------+
Original comment by marku...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2011 at 3:29
Even better - looking forward to seeing that update!
Original comment by jmatts...@dius.com.au
on 27 Nov 2011 at 10:57
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jmatts...@dius.com.au
on 25 Nov 2011 at 2:36Attachments: