Closed smart-underworld closed 1 month ago
The issue is that there are simply no 15 pixels to use when reconstructing the image. This can be seen in the spectrum debugger:
One option is to use -15 pixels in your case, instead of 15. I should add a warning in this case and reduce to the maximum usable shift.
Note also that your gain is probably too high, you are loosing a significant part of the dynamics.
Hi Cèdric:
I often use negative pixel shifts to avoid the banding in the continuum. But it wouldn't be a good idea to restrict the pixel shifting to 15, for those with 2µm pixels. 15 pixels is too small an offset from H-alpha to produce a continuum free of H-alpha details. If I see a single band or a bright section of the disk near the edge in the continuum, I immediately look at the pixel offset and adjust it - in the negative direction if necessary.
steve
On Jun 30, 2024, at 08:02, Cédric Champeau @.***> wrote:
The issue is that there are simply no 15 pixels to use when reconstructing the image. This can be seen in the spectrum debugger:
image.png (view on web) https://github.com/melix/astro4j/assets/316357/4840349b-2eb9-4c42-bf09-b3ae9cc77f80 One option is to use -15 pixels in your case, instead of 15. I should add a warning in this case and reduce to the maximum usable shift.
Note also that your gain is probably too high, you are loosing a significant part of the dynamics.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/melix/astro4j/issues/334#issuecomment-2198590905, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG4JHEHLHIOPB2NNHF266JDZKAMYPAVCNFSM6AAAAABKDZGTTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOJYGU4TAOJQGU. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Not sure what this comment means. You can adjust the continuum shift as needed. It is not limited to 15 or -15.
You were saying "reduce to the maximum usable shift." I was concerned that you might go back to the 15 pixels of INTI. But I now suspect you meant that jSolEx would determine this from the spectral frame average and make a software-based decision, which seems like a good idea.
steve
On Jun 30, 2024, at 08:12, Cédric Champeau @.***> wrote:
Not sure what this comment means. You can adjust the continuum shift as needed. It is not limited to 15 or -15.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/melix/astro4j/issues/334#issuecomment-2198593633, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG4JHEGJGQIKTUZS6NNRJCTZKAN5DAVCNFSM6AAAAABKDZGTTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOJYGU4TGNRTGM. You are receiving this because you commented.
I noticed in the last 2 version (currently 2.5.2), many of my .ser file when processed has a dark band in the reconstructed image. I re-analyzed the exact same file with INIT and got typical reconstructed image as expected. I attached one such result image processed by JSol'ex, and the .ser file and related data can be found in my shared folder:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1peKBQRxkCbCpqkaDw9_pGZdOUB4dBbQV?usp=sharing