Closed crankynetman closed 3 years ago
Yes seems a good idea. I'm terrible with naming shit
It's definitely the hardest part for me as well :joy: . I just put in the PR (#9 ), it probably needs some TLC before merging, but I think it implements everything that the current version has. The only exception is everything under the __name__
block. I figured it might make sense to move that into a separate file that imports the client to demo the client, but am not sold yet.
Closing this off as it's mostly done. For now we're just updating
What do you think about restructuring the client to be a bit less verbose? What I mean by that is structuring things so that the methods of the client act in a (well, at least what I think is :joy: ) more pythonic argument/return fashion.
For example, instead of the current:
We could do:
I'm probably explaining myself poorly, so I created some rough (but working!) example code. If you are interested, I would be glad to flesh this out to implement all BGPStuff features.