Labs that did not (?) complete the debrief form

[mekline]

Some labs seem to have contributed data to the main mb1-analysis, but not filled out the main debrief form. @melsod, can you review for me if any of these cases still need action, or if I have any out of date qualtrics data in this repo?

In particular, these labs DID fill out a secondary questionnaire, but don't have an entry in the main debrief qualtrics form:

[1] "lppparisdescartes2" "babylabyork"
[3] "ldlottawa" "isplabmcgill"
[5] "madlabucsd" "childlabmanchester"

And these labs filled out neither the debrief or the secondary (according to the data downloads I have)

[1] "babylabkingswood" "cfnuofn"
[3] "dcnlabtennessee" "earlysocogfm"
[5] "babylabreading" "trainorlab"

[melsod]

Hm. Looks like you may be missing one or two as at least cfnuofn completed the debrief - I'll reupload.

[mekline]

Hi @melsod just got a chance to re-review this, and the following are still issues (same number, bc cfnuofn is resolved, but nusinfantlanguagecentre is new (we got their data but not debrief, it seems.)

A question because I want to make sure I'm getting this correct: For labs that participated later on, does the secondary data questionnaire capture the debrief info, or did they still need to do both? I can't remember if we combined...

These labs DID fill out a secondary questionnaire, but DON'T have an entry in the main debrief qualtrics form:

[1] "lppparisdescartes2" "babylabyork"
[3] "ldlottawa" "isplabmcgill"
[5] "madlabucsd" "childlabmanchester"

And these labs filled out neither the debrief or the secondary (according to the data downloads I have)

[1] "babylabkingswood"
[2] "dcnlabtennessee"
[3] "earlysocogfm"
[4] "babylabreading"
[5] "trainorlab"
[6] "nusinfantlanguagecentre"

[melsod]

The debrief and the secondary questionnaire have different sets of questions.

I'll send out reminder emails then.