Closed Pomax closed 11 years ago
Fair point, I suppose. The examples page shows off Caman for reals pretty well. The entire site could use a little touching up across the board.
it does, although you can probably silently bind a render() call when the sliders are moved so that there's live feedback rather than needing the render button. For the main page and documention, it's probably also nice to mention the <img src=... data-caman=...> approach from #34, which is more accessible for people who "just want to use Caman".
Agree with both points. I was thinking of revamping the site's front and back-end over the holidays. Thanks for the feedback!
right now it has two images, with the modified image simply a hardcoded bitmap. That should really use the caman.js library on top of the original so that people can see what's going on "for reals". A view-source or inspect element doesn't teach people anything right now (other than, "wait, it's not actually using caman" =)