Open charjr opened 4 months ago
Related to #180 and will likely be fixed with the same change.
Currently it is assumed that if any xOf is present, then the top level schema is empty.
xOf
This may not always be the case, currently we would not handle a schema like this:
schema: type: string, allOf: ...
Membrane would see the allOf and ignore the top level schema, treating it like this:
allOf
schema: allOf: ...
Related to #180 and will likely be fixed with the same change.
Currently it is assumed that if any
xOf
is present, then the top level schema is empty.This may not always be the case, currently we would not handle a schema like this:
Membrane would see the
allOf
and ignore the top level schema, treating it like this: