Open charjr opened 7 months ago
Related to #179 and will likely be fixed with the same change.
Currently it is assumed that if any xOf is present, you wont also have yOf or zOf.
xOf
yOf
zOf
This may not always be the case, currently we would not handle a schema like this:
schema: allOf: ... anyOf: ... oneOf: ...
Membrane would see the allOf and ignore anything else:
allOf
schema: allOf: ...
Related to #179 and will likely be fixed with the same change.
Currently it is assumed that if any
xOf
is present, you wont also haveyOf
orzOf
.This may not always be the case, currently we would not handle a schema like this:
Membrane would see the
allOf
and ignore anything else: