Closed vanatd closed 4 years ago
@alevy Hello, that's cool thanks! I have some ideas how to simplify it.
@alevy i made changes, when you will have some time please take a look on it.
@denis-vanat Looks much better. Can you explain the rationale behind adding the opcode
to the (de)serialize
functions?
@saschat By adding opcode
to (de)serialize
we can decide what to do for each case. ie we can ignore (de)serialize
values for append/prepend
methods or implement it in another way.
@saschat @alevy any thoughts?
@alevy Merge and publish?
Hello @alevy, due to discussion in this pr i made changes in another branch, 'cause we are using my fork.
So I implement seriliazer object which can do stuff what we need.
But i'd like to discuss implementation with you before adding new tests.
Please take a look on it and let me know what you think about it.