The Roboto fonts are licensed under the Apache-2.0 license. Quoting the license:
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions:
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License;
However, it seems like the license for these fonts is not present in this repo. Does this mean that nanovg is violating the Apache license?
I see that the fonts contain licensing info in their metadata:
$ otfinfo --info Roboto-Regular.ttf
Family: Roboto
Subfamily: Regular
Full name: Roboto Regular
PostScript name: Roboto-Regular
Mac font menu name: Roboto Regular
Version: Version 1.100141; 2013
Unique ID: Google:Roboto Regular:2013
Designer: Google
Designer URL: Christian Robertson
Vendor URL: Google.com
Trademark: Roboto is a trademark of Google.
Copyright: Font data copyright Google 2012
License URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License Description: Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0
Vendor ID: Goog
... but I'm unsure whether an URL pointing towards the license counts as a "copy" of the license.
The Roboto fonts are licensed under the Apache-2.0 license. Quoting the license:
However, it seems like the license for these fonts is not present in this repo. Does this mean that nanovg is violating the Apache license?
I see that the fonts contain licensing info in their metadata:
... but I'm unsure whether an URL pointing towards the license counts as a "copy" of the license.