Closed TimvanSteenbergen closed 6 years ago
Hi Tim, Thanks for your contribution!
Is it possible to change these two things?
Roeland,
Sure, I will give it a go. Wanted to do it today, but did not manage.
Are you not able to make those modifications by yourself?
Regards,
Tim
Van: Roeland Salij [mailto:notifications@github.com] Verzonden: maandag 18 december 2017 17:22 Aan: mendix/UnitTesting CC: Tim van Steenbergen; Author Onderwerp: Re: [mendix/UnitTesting] Resolved Deprecations and Warnings. (#9)
Hi Tim, Thanks for your contribution!
Is it possible to change these two things?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mendix/UnitTesting/pull/9#issuecomment-352476881 , or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADbYYrpGFFtvdQa7QhisoYc1cBiYXYVqks5tBpE4gaJpZM4Q5PPv . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ADbYYmvCzqPbScyBFuphpYogLQa1erUXks5tBpE4gaJpZM4Q5PPv.gif
Roeland,
I noticed that the conditional visibility isn't set correctly for the 'remove' image.
What remove image. It is unclear what item on what page you are talking about.
For the images: the quality isn't that good(for the question mark). Can you take the same approach as is done for the clock: Setting the glyphicon classes on a container element.
Quality looks fine to me and the same as the check_mark_icon_16 and the x_mark_icon_16. Of course you are free to upload any other icon to suit your purpose, but I would advise to handle these three in a simular approach instead of giving the question a separate approach simular to the clock, that is used somewhere else.
Regards,
Tim
Van: Roeland Salij [mailto:notifications@github.com] Verzonden: maandag 18 december 2017 17:22 Aan: mendix/UnitTesting CC: Tim van Steenbergen; Author Onderwerp: Re: [mendix/UnitTesting] Resolved Deprecations and Warnings. (#9)
Hi Tim, Thanks for your contribution!
Is it possible to change these two things?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mendix/UnitTesting/pull/9#issuecomment-352476881 , or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADbYYrpGFFtvdQa7QhisoYc1cBiYXYVqks5tBpE4gaJpZM4Q5PPv . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ADbYYmvCzqPbScyBFuphpYogLQa1erUXks5tBpE4gaJpZM4Q5PPv.gif
Roeland,
You can also give me a call if you'dd like, 0627652529 in NL. These two minor issues will then be easily solved and the pullrequest merged.
Regards,
Tim
Van: Tim van Steenbergen [mailto:tim@tieka.nl] Verzonden: donderdag 21 december 2017 12:20 Aan: 'mendix/UnitTesting' Onderwerp: RE: [mendix/UnitTesting] Resolved Deprecations and Warnings. (#9)
Roeland,
I noticed that the conditional visibility isn't set correctly for the 'remove' image.
What remove image. It is unclear what item on what page you are talking about.
For the images: the quality isn't that good(for the question mark). Can you take the same approach as is done for the clock: Setting the glyphicon classes on a container element.
Quality looks fine to me and the same as the check_mark_icon_16 and the x_mark_icon_16. Of course you are free to upload any other icon to suit your purpose, but I would advise to handle these three in a simular approach instead of giving the question a separate approach simular to the clock, that is used somewhere else.
Regards,
Tim
Van: Roeland Salij [mailto:notifications@github.com] Verzonden: maandag 18 december 2017 17:22 Aan: mendix/UnitTesting CC: Tim van Steenbergen; Author Onderwerp: Re: [mendix/UnitTesting] Resolved Deprecations and Warnings. (#9)
Hi Tim, Thanks for your contribution!
Is it possible to change these two things?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mendix/UnitTesting/pull/9#issuecomment-352476881 , or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADbYYrpGFFtvdQa7QhisoYc1cBiYXYVqks5tBpE4gaJpZM4Q5PPv . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ADbYYmvCzqPbScyBFuphpYogLQa1erUXks5tBpE4gaJpZM4Q5PPv.gif
Hi Tim, Does it work for you if we discuss this prior to or after the meetup @ Mendix today?
Hi Roeland. We started a new project today so as of now I am extra interested in UnitTesting. I found the visibility flaw you mentioned. So I repaired that one. The question mark is now nice looking image. Agreed that Glyphicons can get customized using css. But I can't imagine this being a problem in any project using this Great module.
Are you ever going to import this branch?
Yes, I will continue with the merging process this week.
Van: Tim van Steenbergen notifications@github.com Verzonden: woensdag 4 april 2018 08:25 Aan: mendix/UnitTesting UnitTesting@noreply.github.com CC: Roeland Salij Roeland.Salij@mendix.com; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Onderwerp: Re: [mendix/UnitTesting] Resolved Deprecations and Warnings. (#9)
Are you ever going to import this branch?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/mendix/UnitTesting/pull/9#issuecomment-378493770, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGoX_Wsq2urakJQKGw-w-9QMJ7hRPT2Tks5tlGdDgaJpZM4Q5PPv.