Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I suppose it would be fair to use null as a backup default value for any
nullable parameter.
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 12 Jan 2011 at 9:01
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 12 Jan 2011 at 10:02
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 13 Jul 2011 at 6:18
Original comment by fry@google.com
on 16 Feb 2012 at 7:17
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 30 May 2012 at 7:41
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 30 May 2012 at 7:45
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 22 Jun 2012 at 6:16
Original comment by kevinb@google.com
on 22 Jun 2012 at 6:58
This was fixed in 11.0, but we never updated the bug:
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/detail?r=556976f81c236be7798e5d0
65a0dae09ca0cc1d3
We should add an explicit test for this if there isn't one already.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 22 Jun 2012 at 7:10
Test added:
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/detail?r=8634dfafb850b8150c14de0
fc9c24cfcd05093cc
Sorry for the bug, the delay in fixing it, the lack of notification, and the
failure to add a test. Ugh.
Original comment by cpov...@google.com
on 22 Jun 2012 at 8:09
This issue has been migrated to GitHub.
It can be found at https://github.com/google/guava/issues/<id>
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 1 Nov 2014 at 4:15
Original comment by cgdecker@google.com
on 3 Nov 2014 at 9:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
goo...@chsemrau.de
on 29 Dec 2010 at 11:46Attachments: