issues
search
mengelbart
/
rtp-over-quic-draft
Other
14
stars
5
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Add RTCP overhead considerations for streams/datagrams
#227
mengelbart
opened
1 month ago
1
How to maintain RTCP bandwidth limits?
#226
aboba
opened
1 month ago
2
Update order and institution
#225
mengelbart
closed
2 months ago
0
Align RoQ and SDP-RoQ drafts (in RoQ)
#224
SpencerDawkins
opened
2 months ago
0
Resolve Signaling dependency discussed in interim meeting
#223
mengelbart
closed
2 months ago
1
Remove signaling dependency
#222
mengelbart
closed
2 months ago
3
Fill out BBC gst-roq implementation section
#221
samhurst
closed
3 months ago
1
Update implementation experience
#220
mengelbart
closed
3 months ago
1
RoQ Implementation Experience
#219
aboba
closed
3 months ago
2
Clarify ROQ_EXPECTATION_UNMET usage
#218
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Remove sentence that should have been removed PR 212
#217
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Review comments from Jörg
#216
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Move the error handling section before the sections on considerations for Congestion Control, API, etc.
#215
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Fix streams terminology
#214
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Apply Jörg's review comments
#213
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Fix a race condition cause by out of band signaling
#212
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
1
Correct link and title for IEEE 1733
#211
SpencerDawkins
closed
4 months ago
0
Update AVB RTCP packet description and correct PSFB value
#210
SpencerDawkins
closed
4 months ago
0
Remove duplicate *and*
#209
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Finish intro sentence
#208
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Fix target bitrate font/style
#207
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Fix 5-tuple sentence
#206
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Replace DTLS with SRTP
#205
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
2
Clarify new QUIC streams may be client- or server-initiated
#204
SpencerDawkins
closed
4 months ago
1
Clarify RoQ relationship with QUIC client-server roles
#203
SpencerDawkins
closed
4 months ago
0
Clarify usage of "peer-to-peer" term
#202
SpencerDawkins
closed
4 months ago
0
Remove reference to NATs/Firewalls
#201
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
This clarifies and corrects uses of "peer" and "receiver"
#200
SpencerDawkins
closed
4 months ago
0
Replace RoQ/non-RoQ with real-time non-real-time
#199
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Add pacing recommendation reference to RFC9002
#198
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Replace RoQ/non-RoQ with real-time/non-real-time
#197
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
0
Add reference for pacing recommendation
#196
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
1
Use of the term "peer"
#195
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
3
P2P and Client/Server connection setup
#194
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
2
working well through NATs and firewalls
#193
mengelbart
closed
4 months ago
3
Apply clean-up comments
#192
SpencerDawkins
closed
5 months ago
0
I missed one lower-case "document"
#191
SpencerDawkins
closed
5 months ago
0
Clarify usage of "RTP" and "RTCP" in the document
#190
SpencerDawkins
closed
5 months ago
1
Improve Future Directions section
#189
SpencerDawkins
closed
5 months ago
0
Clarify RTP vs RTCP vs RTP/RTCP handling early in the document
#188
SpencerDawkins
closed
5 months ago
1
Restructure Directions for Future Work section
#187
SpencerDawkins
closed
5 months ago
0
Minor editorial tweak
#186
JonathanLennox
closed
5 months ago
0
Fix some spelling mistakes
#185
mengelbart
closed
5 months ago
0
Describe considerations for early data with 0-RTT
#184
SpencerDawkins
closed
6 months ago
2
Resolve editor's notes
#183
SpencerDawkins
closed
6 months ago
0
Resolving all Editor's Notes in the current draft
#182
SpencerDawkins
closed
6 months ago
0
Specify how the contents of the 0-RTT initial packet payload are handled in RoQ
#181
SpencerDawkins
closed
6 months ago
0
Clarify use of the word transport parameters
#180
mengelbart
closed
6 months ago
0
Remove speculations about ICE with QUIC
#179
SpencerDawkins
closed
6 months ago
0
Add Futures section and change document category to "exp" (Experimental)
#178
SpencerDawkins
closed
6 months ago
0
Next