Closed SachsA closed 3 years ago
Merging #1 (cca613b) into main (9e8bf86) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 51 51
=========================================
Hits 51 51
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
fmutils.go | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9e8bf86...cca613b. Read the comment docs.
Please add a test that covers this case.
Yes of course. Sorry I just realized that I didn't commit them... Forgive me. I will do it tomorrow.
@mennanov There you go, I added some tests. Hope this is ok for you. Feel free to reach me if you need.
Your pull request actually revealed that the code does not currently support an important use case: masks in repeated non-scalar fields. I created a pull request to address this issue: https://github.com/mennanov/fmutils/pull/2 It should also fix the problem this pull request addresses. Please, take a look at that pull request and let me know if it works for you. If everything is OK i'll merge my pull request in favor of this one.
Thanks for contributing!
This condition was missing when trying to filter on nested structs it was panicing.