Add Model and ID to MQTT topic

[DeadEnded]

Hello whoever is reading this. I am very new to github and just started toying the RTL_433. This may be the incorrect way to do this (I am thinking it might be a pull request) - but I know you prefer to keep this as simple as possible, so this might not be something you want to put into the repository.

BUT - I was very excited to figure this out (since I am so inexperienced). I have multiple identical devices that I want to use RTL_433 to send MQTT messages for. The problem is I want to be able to separate them with topics, but RTL_433 by default does not do this.

SO - my google-fu led me to a working solution. Here are the simple steps I used to do this:

1) Add jq to the apt install list 2) Add the following modification to rtl2mqtt.sh

After the first echo $line add:

DEVICE="$(echo $line | jq --raw-output '.model' | tr ' ' '_')" ID="$(echo $line | jq --raw-output '.id')"

Change the mosquitto_pub topic to:

"RTL_433/Raw/$DEVICE/$ID"

Well, that's it... This might be common knowledge for those here who are experienced, but I was happy to solve my problem, and wanted to share :-)

Cheers! DeadEnd

[zuckschwerdt]

That's a good post-processing hint. We currently rely on either that shell script to bridge to MQTT or something like https://github.com/zuckschwerdt/rtl_433_relay/blob/master/rtl_433_mqtt_relay.py – which is easier to customize and has better performance.

We also have working code for MQTT in rtl_433 to support that directly. It's just not clear how topics and payloads should be formed. E.g. identify the device by model/id or model/id/channel or model/(channel otherwise id)? Put JSON at that topic or split some/all values to sub-topic, e.g. model/channel/temperature seems nice. And what about units? Some one has to investigate all this, and make a proposal

[mikejac]

Maybe use the Homie convention: An MQTT Convention for IoT/M2M ??

/michael

[bademux]

Sorry for resurecting closed topic. @zuckschwerdt OpenHab (internaly runs MQTT broker) supports Homie 3.x specification and HomeAssistant MQTT Components specification so maybe one of those?

[zuckschwerdt]

Thanks for the suggestions and documentation links. Both formats seem very verbose if we need to support our very generic sensor types. But I guess we can add both as options. (e.g. something like -F mqtt:192.168.1.2:1883,homie=1,hamcs=1) For a first test and to develop the necessary translation we should use https://github.com/zuckschwerdt/rtl_433_relay/blob/master/rtl_433_mqtt_relay.py

[bademux]

Sounds great! Just small suggestion:

• I'm not shure what hamcs means, but if it stays for HomeAssistans (guys use hass as shortage), than it is better to use hassmcs (yeah too ssss) or just hass.
• Do we need ability to send 2 types of messages to the same topic at the same time? How about type={homie,hass}
• mosquitto_pub supports -L (--url) option that allows to provide connection in standard way as URI mqtt(s)://[username[:password]@]host[:port]/topic. Looks like it will fit into rt_433 console arg design with no pain. In that way we can add homie=1,hamcs=1 can be implemented as root path: mqtt(s)://[username[:password]@]host[:port]/{homie,hass}/topic

Anyway thanks for the project!