Closed schmittel closed 11 months ago
Hi @schmittel, if anvi'o says Bacteria_71
is missing, then it must be missing :) Those models are run on contigs-dbs regardless of the evolutionary origin of genomes. Can you please send the output for anvi-db-info
run on /anvio/contigs_db_kegg/arch0001-CONTIGS.db
?
Sure, here's the output:
DB Info (no touch)
===============================================
Database Path ................................: /anvio/contigs_db_kegg/arch0001-CONTIGS.db
description ..................................: [Not found, but it's OK]
db_type ......................................: contigs (variant: unknown)
version ......................................: 20
DB Info (no touch also)
===============================================
project_name .................................: arch0001
contigs_db_hash ..............................: hash32966ace
split_length .................................: 20000
kmer_size ....................................: 4
num_contigs ..................................: 171
total_length .................................: 2376348
num_splits ...................................: 192
gene_level_taxonomy_source ...................: None
genes_are_called .............................: 1
external_gene_calls ..........................: 0
external_gene_amino_acid_seqs ................: 0
skip_predict_frame ...........................: 0
splits_consider_gene_calls ...................: 1
scg_taxonomy_was_run .........................: 0
scg_taxonomy_database_version ................: None
trna_taxonomy_was_run ........................: 0
trna_taxonomy_database_version ...............: None
creation_date ................................: 1692961794.15059
modules_db_hash ..............................: d20a0dcd2128
gene_function_sources ........................: KOfam,Protista_83,Ribosomal_RNA_5S,KEGG_BRITE,Ribosomal_RNA_28S,KEGG_Class,COG20_PATHWAY,Archaea_76,Ribosomal_RNA_12S,Ribosomal_RNA_16S,COG20_CATEGORY,Ribosomal_RNA_18S,Bacteria_71,Transfer_RNAs,COG20_FUNCTION,Ribosomal_RNA_23S,Pfam,KEGG_Module
* Please remember that it is never a good idea to change these values. But in some
cases it may be absolutely necessary to update something here, and a
programmer may ask you to run this program and do it. But even then, you
should be extremely careful.
AVAILABLE GENE CALLERS
===============================================
* 'prodigal' (2,812 gene calls)
* 'Transfer_RNAs' (46 gene calls)
AVAILABLE FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION SOURCES
===============================================
* Archaea_76 (78 annotations)
* Bacteria_71 (40 annotations)
* COG20_CATEGORY (1,723 annotations)
* COG20_FUNCTION (1,723 annotations)
* COG20_PATHWAY (480 annotations)
* KEGG_BRITE (1,168 annotations)
* KEGG_Class (313 annotations)
* KEGG_Module (313 annotations)
* KOfam (1,296 annotations)
* Pfam (4,067 annotations)
* Protista_83 (23 annotations)
* Ribosomal_RNA_12S (0 annotations)
* Ribosomal_RNA_16S (0 annotations)
* Ribosomal_RNA_18S (0 annotations)
* Ribosomal_RNA_23S (0 annotations)
* Ribosomal_RNA_28S (0 annotations)
* Ribosomal_RNA_5S (0 annotations)
* Transfer_RNAs (46 annotations)
AVAILABLE HMM SOURCES
===============================================
* 'Transfer_RNAs' (61 models with 46 hits)
Thanks!
AVAILABLE HMM SOURCES
does not list any sources for SCGs. Please re-run anvi-run-hmms
.
Since we can see the HMM sources in the functional annotation source list, it seems like you ran HMMs with the flag --add-to-functions-table
. So when you re-run HMMs, don't use that flag and the HMMs will go to the right place in the database. :)
Ahh that's it, thanks. I certainly did use that flag and will run it again without it. Much appreciated.
Since we can see the HMM sources in the functional annotation source list,
WELL, speak for yourself with your laser vision, hacker (clearly Meren is unable to see things that matter 😂). Thanks for catching that!
Hi,
After running
anvi-run-scg-taxonomy
I'm getting the following error for each of my contigs databases:The command I used was:
I had previously run
anvi-run-hmms
without error, using the default HMM libraries (i.e. all of them). I'm guessing the problem is because my contig databases are all archaeal, which is why the Bacteria_71 HMM is not being found. But surely GTDb can classify archaeal sequences?I'm using the latest development version of Anvio.
Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks.