tdelmont
commented
8 years ago Meren suggested we should not loose the link between bins and the "master" CONCOCT cluster, when using CONCOCT for pre-clustering. I suggest we rename bins and even rename and organize contigs by length, but keep the assembly contig name and master cluster number in the header of contigs, as an additional information.
One example could be:
"Anvio_is_the_best_MAG001_contig001 [Assembly contig_K03245] [Master cluster bin_03]" ACCTTGGATCG "Anvio_is_the_best_MAG001_contig002 [Assembly contig_K435245] [Master cluster bin_03]" ATTGCTT
It is the way NCBI includes metadata for contigs (e.g., > contig_393956 [mitochondria]) but maybe a space is problematic for us?
If the assembly, and the CONCOCT clustering table are available, then people can link everything, yet the genomic collection is in a better shape.
Tom
Hi, now we have more and more "final genomic collections" identified using anvi'o. Most of my bins are named like "Bin_137_1_2" or "Bin_0_2". I feel it would be great to rename the bins in a more logical and more instructive manner before sharing it with people.
Here is my suggestion: a command line to rename bins using a Project name, then bins are named by numbers based on length: In project called "Anvio_is_the_best", then largest bin would be "Anvio_is_the_best_MAG001", and so one...
What do you think??? Would look more organized, no?
Tom