174 yields the following (with a second angle to see better)
So it seems to fix it, but as I said in #170, this seems to mess up the pose somehow.
Applying #170 instead gives the correct pose (the one from the first screenshot but with the missing geometry)
This PR adds a test for loading a complex Collada file,
upperarm.dae
from https://github.com/Gepetto/example-robot-data/blob/master/robots/ur_description/meshes/ur5/visual/upperarm.daeI'm getting this on the current HEAD
174 yields the following (with a second angle to see better)
So it seems to fix it, but as I said in #170, this seems to mess up the pose somehow. Applying #170 instead gives the correct pose (the one from the first screenshot but with the missing geometry)