Add support for ARM with a multi platform workflow

[Revolyssup]

Current Behavior

Meshery operator is only built for x86 architecture currently.

Desired Behavior

Remove any platform hardcoding from Dockerfile and add a multiplatform workflow. Refer to other Meshery repositories.

Implementation

Acceptance Tests

Mockups

---

Contributor Guides and Resources

• 🛠 Meshery Build & Release Strategy
• 📚 Instructions for contributing to documentation
  • Meshery documentation site and source
• 🎨 Wireframes and designs for Meshery UI in Figma
• 🙋🏾🙋🏼 Questions: Layer5 Discussion Forum and Layer5 Community Slack

[XDRAGON2002]

@Revolyssup I would like to work on this, but could you guide me a bit as to what all changes need to be done?

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[stale[bot]]

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

[leecalcote]

@Revolyssup has this been a topic in the Meshery Build and Release meeting?

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[Aisuko]

It looks like we have a cross-platform script already but we do not use it. https://github.com/meshery/meshery-operator/blob/08983a686bd6672a8de44b68f0fa3440388039bf/Makefile#L155-L164

https://github.com/meshery/meshery-operator/blob/08983a686bd6672a8de44b68f0fa3440388039bf/.github/workflows/build-and-release.yml#L23-L38

[sandramsc]

This issue has been open for some time with no recent activity, unassigning to open it up for new contributors to give it a go.

[dongrep]

Can i give it a go?

[lekaf974]

@leecalcote, @Revolyssup is this something still required ?