Closed kayhide closed 4 years ago
Closing this in favor of #155, which seems less complex (no threads) and thus easier to review.
@AladW Hi, thanks for your consideration. Okay I respect your decision.
I think I will go with my fork because in my environment, it takes more than 10 seconds if it's not parallelized and I don't want to make it that slow. Besides, I have some other ideas to make it even faster while breaking backward compatibility.
Anyway, thanks for your great work!
Ideally the underlying issue on slowness would be solved, rather than pave over it with multiple threads. The only reliable solution I've found so far is ffmpeg
. #146 may have some ideas, but a simple implementation (read: reviewable) implementation is preferable.
Hello,
I updated the script and supported multi-monitor.
Using
xrandr
command, it lists active monitors and processes on every subsection corresponding to the monitor's position and size.On my dual monitor environment, it works as: