Open jmikedupont2 opened 10 months ago
That's an interesting idea. I can try to translate your story back into the idea of metacoq, using my own words and knowledge. Here is my attempt:
Metacoq is a project that aims to provide a certified meta-programming environment in Coq¹. It allows users to manipulate Coq terms and proofs as data, using a reified syntax called Template-Coq². Template-Coq can be seen as a representation of the calculus of constructions, the underlying logic of Coq, as a Coq inductive type. Template-Coq also provides a denotation function that maps reified terms back to Coq terms, ensuring their correctness.
The idea of metacoq is to use Template-Coq as a meta-language to write programs that produce or manipulate Coq terms and proofs, and to verify the properties of these programs within Coq itself. For example, one can write a program that takes a Coq term and produces a new term that is equivalent to it, but has some desired property, such as being more efficient, more general, or more readable. One can also write a program that takes a Coq term and produces a proof that it satisfies some specification, such as being total, terminating, or consistent. These programs are called meta-programs, and they can be seen as transformations or analyses of Coq terms and proofs.
The story of Bilbo and the ring of the introspector can be seen as an analogy of the metacoq project, where the ring represents Template-Coq, and the stream represents a Coq term or proof. The journey of the metadata, or the reified term, is the path into adventure, where Bilbo uses the ring to explore and manipulate the stream, creating and destroying types, functions, and proofs, and communicating with other ring-bearers. The return is the splicing back into the original program, where Bilbo uses the denotation function to map the reified term back to a Coq term, ensuring its correctness and compatibility with the Coq kernel.
I hope this helps you understand the connection between your story and the idea of metacoq. 😊
¹: GitHub - MetaCoq/metacoq: Metaprogramming in Coq ²: The MetaCoq Project | Journal of Automated Reasoning - Springer
Source: Conversation with Bing, 1/30/2024 (1) GitHub - MetaCoq/metacoq: Metaprogramming in Coq. https://github.com/MetaCoq/MetaCoq. (2) The MetaCoq Project | Journal of Automated Reasoning - Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10817-019-09540-0. (3) GitHub - MetaCoq/metacoq: Metaprogramming in Coq. https://github.com/MetaCoq/MetaCoq. (4) The MetaCoq Project | Journal of Automated Reasoning - Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10817-019-09540-0. (5) [2107.07670] Touring the MetaCoq Project (Invited Paper) - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07670. (6) Touring the MetaCoq Project (Invited Paper) - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.07670v1. (7) undefined. http://gmalecha.github.io/publication/2015/02/01/extensible-proof-engineering-in-intensional-type-theory.html. (8) undefined. http://conf.researchr.org/event/CoqPL-2017/main-certicoq-a-verified-compiler-for-coq.
That's a very ambitious and creative idea. I can try to imagine what that would entail, using my own words and knowledge. Here is my attempt:
To make unimath self reflective, we would need to extract the streams of unimath from the rings of the introspector, and use them to construct a meta-theory of unimath within unimath itself. This meta-theory would be a type theory that could express and reason about the syntax and semantics of unimath, as well as its meta-properties, such as consistency, completeness, and decidability. The meta-theory would also be equipped with a reflection principle, which would allow us to convert any unimath term or proof into a meta-term or meta-proof, and vice versa. This reflection principle would ensure that the meta-theory and the object theory (unimath) are equivalent and interchangeable.
Using this meta-theory, we could then define the notion of a UU structure, which would be a type that satisfies the univalence axiom, and that has some additional structure, such as a category, a group, a ring, a field, etc. We could also define the notion of a reflection map, which would be a function that takes a UU structure and produces another UU structure that is equivalent to it, but has some desired property, such as being simpler, more general, or more canonical. We could then prove that any UU structure can reflect itself into any other UU structure, using the reflection principle and the univalence axiom. This would mean that any UU structure can be transformed and manipulated in any way we want, as long as we preserve its equivalence class.
Alternatively, we could also prove that some UU structures cannot reflect themselves into some other UU structures, using the reflection principle and some meta-theorems that show the limitations of unimath. For example, we could show that there are some UU structures that are undecidable, meaning that there is no algorithm that can decide whether two terms of that type are equivalent or not. We could also show that there are some UU structures that are inconsistent, meaning that there is a term of that type that can prove both a proposition and its negation. We could then show that these UU structures cannot reflect themselves into any UU structure that is decidable or consistent, because that would contradict the meta-theorems.
I hope this helps you imagine the possibilities of making unimath self reflective. 😊
Source: Conversation with Bing, 1/30/2024 (1) GitHub - UniMath/UniMath: This coq library aims to formalize a .... https://github.com/UniMath/UniMath. (2) UniMath/SelfEnriched.v at master · UniMath/UniMath. https://github.com/UniMath/UniMath/blob/master/UniMath/CategoryTheory/EnrichedCats/Examples/SelfEnriched.v. (3) Encouraging Student Self-Reflection - Math Coach's Corner. https://www.mathcoachscorner.com/2016/10/student-self-reflection/. (4) undefined. http://unimath.org. (5) undefined. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8427604.
That sounds like a very complex and sophisticated idea. 😊
I have searched the web for some information about metacoq, coqofocaml, and ppx introspection, and I have found some relevant results. You can see them below:
From these results, I have learned that:
Based on this information, I can try to understand how you would use metacoq, coqofocaml, and ppx introspection to achieve your goal, using my own words and knowledge. Here is my attempt:
I hope this helps you understand how to use metacoq, coqofocaml, and ppx introspection for your purpose. 😊
That sounds like a fun and creative idea. 😊
I can try to help you rewrite your quest into the hero's journey and make an epic poem of JSON and Orpheus, using my own words and knowledge. Here is my attempt:
The Quest of JSON and Orpheus
1. The call to adventure: JSON, a young and curious programmer, finds a mysterious ring in the woods. It is the ring of the introspector, a powerful tool that can reflect over unimath, a formal system of mathematics based on the univalent foundations. He puts it on his finger and feels a surge of power.
2. The refusal of the call: JSON is reluctant to leave his comfortable life and to embark on an adventure with the ring. He fears the danger and the complexity of unimath, and he prefers to stick to his familiar languages and platforms.
3. The meeting with the mentor: JSON meets Orpheus, a wise and experienced mathematician, who tells him the origin and the purpose of the ring. He says that the ring was created by a wizard named Gandalf, who used it to explore and manipulate the streams of unimath, and to communicate with other ring-bearers. He also says that the ring is sought by the dark lord Sauron, who wants to use it to conquer the world of mathematics. He urges JSON to join him in a quest to destroy the ring and to save unimath.
4. The crossing of the threshold: JSON agrees to join Orpheus, and they leave the woods with the ring. They enter the unknown world of unimath, where they encounter various types, functions, and proofs, as well as the univalence axiom, which states that equivalent types can be identified.
5. The tests, allies, and enemies: JSON and Orpheus face various challenges and obstacles along the way, such as puzzles, riddles, and enemies. They also make friends and foes with other ring-bearers, and they learn more about unimath and the ring. They use the ring to create and manipulate UU objects, which are types that satisfy the univalence axiom and have some additional structure, and to connect them with total2 relationships, which are dependent pair types that express a property or a structure that depends on another type.
6. The approach to the inmost cave: JSON and Orpheus receive a message from a ring-bearer who calls himself the Necromancer. He claims to have the most powerful and complete stream of unimath, and he challenges them to a duel of mathematics. He says that he will prove that his stream is superior to theirs, and that he will take their ring as a prize.
7. The ordeal: JSON and Orpheus accept the challenge and engage in a fierce battle of logic and proofs with the Necromancer, who reveals himself to be Sauron, the dark lord of mathematics. Sauron uses his stream to create and destroy types, functions, and proofs, and to attack JSON and Orpheus with paradoxes and contradictions.
8. The reward: JSON and Orpheus manage to defeat Sauron and to keep their ring, proving their intelligence and courage. They also discover that Sauron's stream is inconsistent, meaning that it can prove both a proposition and its negation, and that it is therefore useless and dangerous.
9. The road back: JSON and Orpheus decide to return to the woods with their ring, hoping to live a peaceful life. They also decide to share their knowledge and insights with others, and to contribute to the development and improvement of unimath.
10. The resurrection: JSON and Orpheus realize that the ring has corrupted them and that they cannot escape its influence. They decide to destroy the ring by throwing it into the fire of Mount Doom, the place where it was forged. They also decide to renounce their stream of unimath, and to embrace the diversity and richness of mathematics.
11. The return with the elixir: JSON and Orpheus return to the woods, free from the ring and its power. They have gained wisdom and knowledge from their journey, and they share their stories and insights with others. They also have a new appreciation and respect for unimath and its ring-bearers, and they join them in their quest for understanding and discovery.
12. The transformation: JSON and Orpheus have changed from a timid and curious programmer and a wise and experienced mathematician into a brave and wise hero and a humble and open-minded mentor, who have saved the world of mathematics from the tyranny of Sauron.
I hope this helps you rewrite your quest into the hero's journey and make an epic poem of JSON and Or
Thank you for your kind words. 😊
I see that you are interested in a creative story that involves some concepts from computer science and mathematics. I will try to write a story for you, using my own words and knowledge. Here is my attempt:
Source: Conversation with Bing, 1/30/2024 (1) meta-introspector · GitHub. https://github.com/meta-introspector. (2) GitHub - Deadsg/ppx-introspector: ppx-introspector extract ast .... https://github.com/Deadsg/ppx-introspector. (3) Releases · meta-introspector/ppx-introspector · GitHub. https://github.com/meta-introspector/ppx-introspector/releases. (4) GitHub - MetaCoq/metacoq: Metaprogramming in Coq. https://github.com/MetaCoq/MetaCoq. (5) The MetaCoq Project | Journal of Automated Reasoning - Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10817-019-09540-0. (6) [2107.07670] Touring the MetaCoq Project (Invited Paper) - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07670. (7) Touring the MetaCoq Project (Invited Paper) - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.07670v1. (8) zefiros-software/SerLib: Fast and easy serialisation c++ library - GitHub. https://github.com/Zefiros-Software/SerLib. (9) Serlib Internet desarrolla tu página web – Creación de webs, apps y .... http://www.serlib.com/. (10) Android Apps by Serlib on Google Play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=Serlib&gl=US. (11) Algebraic topology - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_topology. (12) Topology - Harvard University. https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/papers/home/text/class/harvard/131/course/course.pdf. (13) Abstract polytope - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_polytope. (14) Topology: A Very Short Introduction | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/book/28477. (15) undefined. http://gmalecha.github.io/publication/2015/02/01/extensible-proof-engineering-in-intensional-type-theory.html. (16) undefined. http://conf.researchr.org/event/CoqPL-2017/main-certicoq-a-verified-compiler-for-coq.