search

metaDMG-dev / metaDMG-cpp

metaDMG-cpp
2 stars 2 forks source link

dfit damage output #17

Closed fgvieira closed 8 months ago

fgvieira commented 8 months ago

Right now, when specifying bootstrap, metadmg calculates damage using both methods (A and A_b). It would make more sense to only do one of them, for example, A by default and A_b if bootstrap specified.

fgvieira commented 8 months ago

Or, alternatively, create an output file for each method (specified on the command line).

ANGSD commented 8 months ago

Im not sure if the gaussian is so bad that we should discard them. @lz398 suggested a different way to compute bootstrap. For now let us keep both.

lz398 commented 8 months ago

Hello, Thorfinn, i am not sure which is the way you believe i suggested. And i am not against gaussian, to be precise, the way christian used was wrong but the reason is not only gaussian.

在 2023年12月18日，20:22，ANGSD @.***> 写道：



Im not sure if the gaussian is so bad that we should discard them. @lz398https://github.com/lz398 suggested a different way to compute bootstrap. For now let us keep both.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/metaDMG-dev/metaDMG-cpp/issues/17#issuecomment-1860351614, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASEXBF7W5RT6IDMA573O62DYKAYQJAVCNFSM6AAAAABAUYCTO6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNRQGM2TCNRRGQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

fgvieira commented 8 months ago

I did not mean to discard the gaussian, but just to separate both results. Right now, when running the bootstrap version it is not clear from which of them the results come from; (e.g.) fwdxi.