The README.md says this is GPL 3.0 but the license file says this is AGPL. Why do you put that extremely restrictive license on a combination of Symfony - which is gratefully MIT licensed - and WordPress - which is GPLv2.0 licensed?
This makes a project which is essentially a great idea totally useless for any closed source project, even if it is a server-side application which also means growing the project and contribution is much less likely.
In doubt I must assume that the license is AGPL just as in the license file.
The README.md says this is GPL 3.0 but the license file says this is AGPL. Why do you put that extremely restrictive license on a combination of Symfony - which is gratefully MIT licensed - and WordPress - which is GPLv2.0 licensed?
This makes a project which is essentially a great idea totally useless for any closed source project, even if it is a server-side application which also means growing the project and contribution is much less likely.
In doubt I must assume that the license is AGPL just as in the license file.
More information: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/107883/agpl-what-you-can-do-and-what-you-cant