Open karenetheridge opened 4 years ago
Do you have an example release we could test this against?
If there is pod markup in a 'DESCRIPTION' line of a module's pod, this should either be stripped or converted to html instead of left alone, when generating the abstract line for a distribution's table of contents.
Do you mean the NAME section?
This release attempts to use E<...>
in the abstracts, https://metacpan.org/release/DLAMBLEY/App-RetroPAN-0.01
I've not looked for an example. but it also looks like metacpan won't extract the abstract from magic comments. Dist::Zilla does /^\s*#+\s*ABSTRACT:[ \t]*(\S.*)$/m
on the source if it cannot find one in the POD.
Do you mean the NAME section?
Yes, thanks.
it also looks like metacpan won't extract the abstract from magic comments
I don't think it should. That information should always be present in the 'NAME' section of built dists.
Reference -- https://github.com/rjbs/Dist-Zilla/pull/647
If there is pod markup in a 'DESCRIPTION' line of a module's pod, this should either be stripped or converted to html instead of left alone, when generating the abstract line for a distribution's table of contents.