Closed Conceptiks closed 1 year ago
My proposal:
Product | ProductType |
---|---|
storage | storage |
c1-medium-x86 | machine |
ip | networking |
c1-xlarge-x86 | machine |
c1-large-x86 | machine |
n1-medium-x86 | machine |
snapshot | networking |
volume | storage |
controlplane | machine/controlplane ? |
I think I'd suggest storage
, network
, compute
, kubernetes
We should think about good descriptions for our products. @philiphaas Maybe you have better ideas than me. 😄
Product | ProductType | Description |
---|---|---|
ip | network | Connect to the internet. |
c1-large-x86 | compute | Our big work horse for difficult tasks |
c1-medium-x86 | compute | Our medium sized server. |
n1-medium-x86 | compute | Our small sized server. |
snapshot | storage | Backup your data. |
volume | storage | Store your data. |
controlplane | kubernetes | The control plane offers a highly available kube-apiserver, a dedicated firewall, IDS events and private networking with an internet gateway. |
@Pilzington Thank you for working on this so quickly!
Just to provide some further context, this will be helpful as part of this PR: https://github.com/metal-stack-cloud/website/pull/178
Within this PR, this is the filtering I currently have to do: https://github.com/metal-stack-cloud/website/blob/561a8581ce475abc8261996865225b0326db0388/sites/website/src/routes/%5Blang%5D/(landingpage)/prices/%2Bpage.svelte#L29C5-L33C73
As for descriptions, how about usage/workload recommendations for the compute resources? Below are some concepts
Product | ProductType | Description -- | -- | -- ip | network | Connect to the internet with ephemeral or static public facing IPv4 addresses. c1-large-x86 | compute | _Idea 1 (workload intensity and max. recommended nodes)_ Recommended for the most complex workloads or roughly 20 worker nodes. c1-medium-x86 | compute | _Idea 2 (more concrete examples)_ Perfect for scaling large APIs or running BI software n1-medium-x86 | compute | _Idea 3 (more playful with example workloads)_ Smooth sailing for simple workloads or just to try our service snapshot | storage | Backup your _cluster instances_ or _persistent volumes_. volume | storage | High performance NVMe-over-TCP persistent storage. controlplane | kubernetes | Includes a highly available kube-apiserver, a dedicated firewall, IDS events and private networking with an internet gateway.@Pilzington Thank you for working on this so quickly!
Just to provide some further context, this will be helpful as part of this PR: metal-stack-cloud/website#178
Within this PR, this is the filtering I currently have to do: https://github.com/metal-stack-cloud/website/blob/561a8581ce475abc8261996865225b0326db0388/sites/website/src/routes/%5Blang%5D/(landingpage)/prices/%2Bpage.svelte#L29C5-L33C73
As for descriptions, how about usage/workload recommendations for the compute resources? Below are some concepts Product ProductType Description ip network Connect to the internet with ephemeral or static public facing IPv4 addresses. c1-large-x86 compute Idea 1 (workload intensity and max. recommended nodes) Recommended for the most complex workloads or roughly 20 worker nodes. c1-medium-x86 compute Idea 2 (more concrete examples) Perfect for scaling large APIs or running BI software n1-medium-x86 compute Idea 3 (more playful with example workloads) Smooth sailing for simple workloads or just to try our service snapshot storage Backup your cluster instances or persistent volumes. volume storage High performance NVMe-over-TCP persistent storage. controlplane kubernetes Includes a highly available kube-apiserver, a dedicated firewall, IDS events and private networking with an internet gateway.
I like the descriptions by @Conceptiks. As for the server sizes, I would go with Idea 1.
@Conceptiks I am not sure what you mean by or roughly 20 worker nodes
c1-large-x86 | compute | Our big work horse for difficult tasks. Recommended for complex workloads. c1-medium-x86 | compute | Our medium sized server. An all-rounder for all kinds of workloads. n1-medium-x86 | compute | Our small sized server. Recommended for simpler, less complex workloads.
Something like this @Pilzington?
The current API-response for
getPrices()
constrains the layout of the pricing page, where I would like to categorise different "types" of prices based on "products".If we could introduce a new enum-field
productType
and possibly even a shortdescription
within the API, that would allow for much more organized, structure pricing page:I am not sure about the exact ENUMS for
productType
, this is just a first draft.Let's discuss!