Failed LaTeXML beta release on Chocolatey

[ronaldtse]

From Chocolatey:

@CAMOBAP is this still valid? Thanks.

'latexml.beta' is Submitted.
Current status = Waiting for Maintainer to take corrective action

chocolatey-ops left the following comment(s):

latexml.beta has failed automated validation.

Requirements

Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.

The package id includes a prerelease version name which should be included only in the version of the package. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

The package id includes dots (.). Usually the package id is separated by '-' instead of dots (except in the case of *.install and *.portable). The reviewer will ensure this is not a new package. More...
Attention - DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

No human moderators see packages until automated checks are passed or the maintainer uses the review comments box to respond. This is very important to understand, if a package has failed any automated checks, you must take action to fix or respond.
ATTENTION: If your package is failing any automated checks, the ONLY way to get in front of a human moderator is to follow the instructions in the next step.
If you need to update or respond to package review information, please login and visit your package page (listed below). Use the Add to Review Comments box ONLY, Disqus/Gist comments will not reach a human reviewer.
This may include review comments prior to the automated checks, check the status on the package - it must be in 'Ready' or 'Responded' to be in front of a human moderator.
You can also self-reject packages in certain scenarios - see self-reject for more information.
Package Url: https://chocolatey.org/packages/latexml.beta/0.8.4 
Maintainer(s): ribose

Maintainer Notes

If we've asked you to make changes, repush your updated package with the exact same version (unless the change we requested was based on an incorrect version).

[ronaldtse]

Sorry, it has passed after all:

'latexml.beta' is Submitted.
Current status = Waiting for Maintainer to take corrective action

chocolatey-ops left the following comment(s):

latexml.beta has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/30e07bbd34816fa2853a3ef0384375c0 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

Attention - DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

No human moderators see packages until automated checks are passed or the maintainer uses the review comments box to respond. This is very important to understand, if a package has failed any automated checks, you must take action to fix or respond.
ATTENTION: If your package is failing any automated checks, the ONLY way to get in front of a human moderator is to follow the instructions in the next step.
If you need to update or respond to package review information, please login and visit your package page (listed below). Use the Add to Review Comments box ONLY, Disqus/Gist comments will not reach a human reviewer.
This may include review comments prior to the automated checks, check the status on the package - it must be in 'Ready' or 'Responded' to be in front of a human moderator.
You can also self-reject packages in certain scenarios - see self-reject for more information.
Package Url: https://chocolatey.org/packages/latexml.beta/0.8.4 
Maintainer(s): ribose

Maintainer Notes

If we've asked you to make changes, repush your updated package with the exact same version (unless the change we requested was based on an incorrect version).

[CAMOBAP]

oh, I forgot about this, highly likely it's related to missing git binary, trying to upload again

[CAMOBAP]

@ronaldtse looks like I have no access to https://chocolatey.org/packages/latexml.beta package could you please add me as a maintainer to it too

[ronaldtse]

Added!

[CAMOBAP]

Per Chocolatey Admins:

The package name you are using, latexml.beta, will not be allowed in the Community Repository as package names should not include a dot (with the exception of .install, .powershell, .extension and .portable) and shouldn't include the word beta, alpha etc.

Can I ask that you create a new package with a valid package name? Or alternatively just update the latexml package with the beta / alpha / pre-release versions?

[CAMOBAP]

I will proceed with 0.8.4.39438-beta release (39438 nuberic representation for first 4 digits in commit)

[CAMOBAP]

Wait for approvement

[ronaldtse]

@CAMOBAP is this done?

[CAMOBAP]

@ronaldtse as far as I see yes, it passed validation https://chocolatey.org/packages/latexml/