Closed opoudjis closed 6 years ago
@ronaldtse , way back we decided not to strip out the boilerplate supplied by users for Terms sections in Chinese GB documents. I assume that's still valid?
I think it would be better if we have a declarative way of handling boilerplate replacement? Eg. Maybe by default we strip any provided boilerplate and issue a warning when there is any boilerplate. If an option is supplied then we don’t strip.
Thoughts @opoudjis ?
More options is more things that can go wrong, but this makes sense. I'll open a new issue.
With recent grammar changes, large number of errors being reported