Closed ronaldtse closed 7 months ago
Asked IHO for clarification:
Some documents contain the document revision history, e.g. S-5/S-8 Guidelines, S-102.
The formats aren’t entirely consistent (as attached).
The necessary elements seem to be:
Can we settle on a consistent format, such as:
—————————————————————————— | Date | Version (edition) | Authorship | Description | ——————————————————————————
S-5/S-8 Guidelines:
S-102:
This is also aligned with NIST and OGC document history.
Following the work done in the BSI ticket, this is going to be the document history encoding for the samples given:
[.preface]
== misc-container
=== document history
[source,yaml]
----
- date:
- type: published
value: 2017-03
edition: 2.0.0
amend:
- description: Covers both S-5 and S-8
- date:
- type: published
value: 2016-07
edition: 1.1.0
amend:
- description: General editing and formatting
- description: Section 3.2 on time frames modified
location: clause=3.2
- description: Modification of section 8.2. Define eligible submission, split review process between individual evaliation and IBSC review process
location: clause=8.2
- description: Inserted checklist and flow diagrams to Annex A
location: annex=A
- date:
- type: published
value: 2016-01
edition: 1.0.0
amend:
description: First edition
----
and
[.preface]
== misc-container
=== document history
[source,yaml]
----
- date:
- type: published
value: 2012-04
edition: 1.0.0
contributor:
- organization:
name: International Hydrographic Organization
subdivision: Transfer Standard Maintenance and Application Development
abbreviation: TSMAD
amend:
- description: Approved edition of S-102
- date:
- type: published
value: 2017-03
edition: 2.0.0
contributor:
- organization:
name: International Hydrographic Organization
subdivision: S-102 Project Team
abbreviation: S-102PT
amend:
description: >
Updated clause 4.0 and 12.0.
Populated clause 9.0 and Annex B.
location:
- clause=4.0
- clause=12.0
- clause=9.0
- annex=B
- date:
- type: updated
value: 2017-05
edition: 2.0.0
contributor:
- organization:
name: International Hydrographic Organization
subdivision: S-102 Project Team
abbreviation: S-102PT
amend:
description: |
Modified clause 9.0 based on feedback at S-100WG2 meeting.
location:
- clause=9.0
- date:
- type: updated
value: 2018-02
edition: 2.0.0
contributor:
- organization:
name: International Hydrographic Organization
subdivision: S-102 Project Team
abbreviation: S-102PT
amend:
description: >
Modified clause 9.0. Deleted contents of Annex B in preparation for updated S-100 Part 10C guidance. Added Annex F: S-102 Dataset Size and Production, Annex G: Gridding Example, Annex H: Statement added for Multi-Resolution Gridding, Annex I: Statement for future S-102 Tiling.
location:
- clause=9.0
- annex=B
- annex=F
- annex=G
- annex=H
- annex=I
- date:
- type: updated
value: 2018-06
edition: 2.0.0
contributor:
- organization:
name: International Hydrographic Organization
subdivision: S-102 Project Team
abbreviation: S-102PT
amend:
description: >
Modifications to align with S-100 v4.0.0, S-100 Part 10c development, and actions from 4th April S-102 Project Team Meeting.
Modified content throughout the following sections:
* Clause 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
* Annexes A, B, D, F, G, and I.
location:
- clause=1
- clause=3
- clause=4
- clause=5
- clause=6
- clause=9
- clause=10
- clause=11
- clause=12
- annex=A
- annex=B
- annex=D
- annex=F
- annex=G
- annex=I
----
At this time, absent any guidance, I am inserting "Document history" as the final preface section if machine readable document history is supplied.
Implementation is now waiting on https://github.com/relaton/relaton-bib/issues/82
From @anermina on S5:
We need to confirm how document revision/history is handled inside a document.
Originally posted by @ronaldtse in https://github.com/metanorma/mn-samples-iho/pull/40#issuecomment-632449138