Open ronaldtse opened 1 year ago
From @matsahlin:
The cross reference in terms I identified from Metanorma as:
But when I recreated what would been what Fonto expected I got this:
The cross references for the Bibliography I found from in Metanorma to be:
But after import to Fonto it looks like this:
And when recreating the cross reference in Fonto I get this:
@Intelligent2013 not sure if there's something we can do but could you have a look? Thanks.
Regarding the issue:
The cross reference in terms I identified from Metanorma as:
I've updated mnconvert to generate tbx:entailedTerm
instead of named-content
for terms within the Terms and definitions clause as noted in '9.3.6 Cross-references between terms in the Terms and definitions clause' in 'IEC/ISO Coding Guidelines':
<tbx:definition><tbx:entailedTerm target="term_3.1.1">entity (3.1.1)</tbx:entailedTerm> with substantial knowledge, experience and competency in the domain</tbx:definition>
But SIS expects the tag xref
instead of tbx:entailedTerm
:
But when I recreated what would been what Fonto expected I got this:
If we need to update mnconvert for support SIS practice, then I need the full XML SIS example to adapt Metanorma to STS XSLT conversion rules specially for SIS format.
The cross references for the Bibliography issue fixed. Now it encodes as:
<xref rid="biblref_13" ref-type="bibr">ISO 19115-1:2014</xref>
As reported by SIS (sis.se). Have requested for more information.
This is probably due to ISO Fonto implementing terms and bibliographic items not as part of the document but in their own individual databases for linking with existing content.