Closed ronaldtse closed 4 years ago
@ronaldtse , I have checked the OGC outputs and they all meet with the specifications given in https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-ogc/issues/91
Just two comments to make:
The warning message established for Best Practice differs in a word from the description given.
In https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-ogc/issues/91: "This document defines an OGC Best Practice on a particular technology..." While, in the outputs: "This document defines an OGC Best Practices on a particular technology..."
(Maybe not a big deal?)
Thanks!
Several docs (10-091r3, 10-100r3, 14-065r2, among others) contain duplicated Preface notes: one generated automatically, and other included by the user in the Preface area. I guess we should remove this last one, right? (I could push PR for that)
Yes please!
"This document defines an OGC Best Practice on a particular technology..." While, in the outputs: "This document defines an OGC Best Practices on a particular technology..."
It should be the first ("This document defines an OGC Best Practice on a particular technology...") since the latter one has wrong grammar.
Thanks!
Is the warning message mistake generated automatically or manually? If automatically, it should be filed at metanorma-ogc. Thanks!
Is the warning message mistake generated automatically or manually? If automatically, it should be filed at metanorma-ogc. Thanks!
Automatically,
Ok!
Is the warning message mistake generated automatically or manually? If automatically, it should be filed at metanorma-ogc. Thanks!
Ticket opened here: https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-ogc/issues/131
@ronaldtse , @opoudjis has already solved the problem of the warning message. I think all is good now regarding this issue.
This issue is solved. Closing.
When these tasks are completed:
All samples (esp 08-062r7 as described in #22 and metanorma/metanorma-ogc#91) should be updated to utilize the common text.