Closed anermina closed 2 months ago
These are indeed missing. We actually need a way to encode these properly.
Caution needs to be taken here.
Type 1: really textual content missing underlines (random underlines in text). => please fix in markup.
Type 2: The ones that say "留意事項" always have their first line underlined. However, this is a presentational issue in the document model. Please do not manually underline any of these.
Thanks!
if these type of provisions are presented in another, more uniform/highlighted style, i am wondering if these type of underlines are really necessary or not. feedback from the client will help to clarify this.
The bleeding of the underline style for links to after the HTTP link has been fixed in #115.
Type 1: really textual content missing underlines (random underlines in text). => please fix in markup.
I think this part is still not fixed. @ronaldtse , could you please confirm that this still needs to be done? Thank you.
I'm taking care of that...
Done.
Procedure: no underlines Same as above → thought to be an ADOC amendment Pattern C
Document 01:
Document 02:
5th and 49th comment from Plateau team