Closed mico closed 1 year ago
Agree.
@ronaldtse I found that identifiers with edition year only (no month or date) formatted differently:
IEC 62525-Edition 1.0 - 2007
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition
The last one more common, the first one appears only once. Right now I render these identifiers as:
IEC 62525 Edition 1.0 2007
IEEE Std 1003.1 Edition 2004
I'm not sure where did this pattern come up from, maybe I just removed "month" part without investigating it. I don't feel it's right, seems we should render these as:
IEC 62525 2007 Edition
IEEE Std 1003.1 2004 Edition
But what if it's not first edition? And actually I don't know what edition number we have for IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition
.
IEEE published documents have an "edition year":
The first one "IEC 62525-Edition 1.0 - 2007" is very strange. It should likely be (one-off) renamed to "IEC 62525:2007". But IEEE should not have IEC references anyway... and it can no longer be found online!
Maybe we should just drop this one because:
This search result:
Leads to:
Identifiers with edition:
There might be other patterns for edition, need to investigate more.