search

metanorma / pubid-iso

Implementation of ISO pubid
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Identifiers with Edition number only #274

Closed mico closed 5 days ago

mico commented 2 weeks ago

There are two identifiers that have only edition number without year:

(these identifiers are not available in relaton-iso-data, I'm not sure where they come from)

Should we leave them as it is or maybe we should raise an error when edition number provided without year?

And some identifiers that don't have edition year for supplement, but have edition number (maybe this is another case):

original source of these identifiers: https://github.com/metanorma/pubid-iso/issues/1#issuecomment-1053930136

some of these identifiers mentioned here: https://github.com/metanorma/pubid-iso/issues/102#issuecomment-1251131247

@ronaldtse here https://github.com/metanorma/pubid-iso/issues/1#issuecomment-1057553289 you are saying we don't need to render edition number, only year, this is implemented, but when using "with_edition" option we still getting "Ed" in pubid output (ISO 11553-1 Ed.2 -> ISO 11553-1 ED2)

opoudjis commented 1 week ago

@andrew2net Just in case, do you know the provenance of ISO 11553-1 Ed.2? @ronaldtse Has ISO changed editorial practice, so that we need to support both formats?

andrew2net commented 1 week ago

@opoudjis I don't. The ISO website doesn't have any ID with edition number.

ronaldtse commented 5 days ago

Should we leave them as it is or maybe we should raise an error when edition number provided without year?

No error should be raised. Closing ticket. Thanks.

do you know the provenance of ISO 11553-1 Ed.2?

These identifiers are all from iso.org. Some of the funny ones come from older standards' bibliography.