Closed mico closed 2 years ago
@ronaldtse for "LCIRC 118sup3/1926" pdf source in NIST Tech Pubs points to not existing document (the same for all identifiers with "/"). Found if here: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-dfbae9c93f8f87bcd830b2b3e58b5597/pdf/GOVPUB-C13-dfbae9c93f8f87bcd830b2b3e58b5597.pdf I don't see "supplement 3" there, only "supplement" published in 1926. Should I represent it as "NBS LC 118sup3/1926" ? The same question for similar LCIRC identifiers, like "LCIRC 145r6/1925"
Found solution for "LCIRC 118sup3/1926", probably it should be "NBS LC 118sup/Upd1-192603" if following logic here: https://github.com/metanorma/nist-pubid/blob/1ff9810fac936c64bb6c5bbab2f58ca353e212fd/spec/nist_pubid/document_spec.rb#L956-L962 Didn't find relation discussion about it.
Fix identifiers parsing with "parse error" output from
nist-pubid report
, e.g.:Now we have 252 identifiers with parsing error.