codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 94.04% // Head: 100.00% // Increases project coverage by +5.96% :tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
2c0cf62) compared to base (645fdfb). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.:exclamation: Current head 2c0cf62 differs from pull request most recent head b1db354. Consider uploading reports for the commit b1db354 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #26 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 94.04% 100.00% +5.96% =========================================== Files 4 4 Lines 319 346 +27 =========================================== + Hits 300 346 +46 + Misses 19 0 -19 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `100.00% <100.00%> (+5.96%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/metaopt/optree/pull/26?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [optree/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://codecov.io/gh/metaopt/optree/pull/26?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt#diff-b3B0cmVlL19faW5pdF9fLnB5) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [optree/ops.py](https://codecov.io/gh/metaopt/optree/pull/26?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt#diff-b3B0cmVlL29wcy5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (+9.15%)` | :arrow_up: | | [optree/registry.py](https://codecov.io/gh/metaopt/optree/pull/26?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt#diff-b3B0cmVlL3JlZ2lzdHJ5LnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (+3.08%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=metaopt):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Description
Describe your changes in detail.
PyTreeSpec.typeand methodPyTreeSpec.is_leaf.Motivation and Context
Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. You can use the syntax
close #15213if this solves the issue #15213Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an
xin all the boxes that apply:Checklist
Go over all the following points, and put an
xin all the boxes that apply. If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!make format. (required)make lint. (required)make testpass. (required)