Open VladimirAlexiev opened 9 months ago
will take note on this and will re-iterate the ontology.
Definitions would really help, thanks !
hi @linnaung make a gsheet and let us help!
Hi @linnaung, @phaasenase, @davidlamprecht ! This query looks for defined terms:
PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
SELECT * WHERE {
values ?kind {rdfs:Class owl:Class rdf:Property owl:ObjectProperty owl:DatatypeProperty}
?x a ?kind
} order by ?x
Can you guarantee that all terms use only these kinds?
It returns 149, all are OWL terms, and there are no duplicates:
csvtk cut -f1 SemOpenAlex-terms.csv|sort|uniq -c
25 http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
83 http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#DatatypeProperty
41 http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty
csvtk cut -f2 SemOpenAlex-terms.csv|sort|uniq -d
A count per ontology:
csvtk cut -f2 SemOpenAlex-terms.csv|perl -pe "s{[^/#\n]+$}{}" | sort|uniq -c
1 http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/vocab#
13 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/ontology# <<<<<<<
5 http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/
8 http://purl.org/dc/terms/
1 http://purl.org/spar/bido/
1 http://purl.org/spar/cito/
5 http://purl.org/spar/fabio/
1 http://schema.org/
4 http://www.geonames.org/ontology#
1 http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
5 http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
1 http://www.w3.org/ns/org#
3 http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
3 https://dbpedia.org/ontology/
7 https://dbpedia.org/property/
90 https://semopenalex.org/ontology/
The one marked <<<<<<<
seems spurios to me, should I discard these terms?
Next I tried this and saved SemOpenAlex-props-describe.ttl
construct {?p ?x ?y}
where {
values ?kind { owl:ObjectProperty owl:DatatypeProperty}
?p a ?kind; ?x ?y
}
And SemOpenAlex-classes-describe.ttl:
construct {?cl ?x ?y}
where {
?cl a owl:Class; ?x ?y
}
Looked for fields that may ease understanding:
@davidlamprecht a few more prefixes to define:
I filtered to only used props by adding
filter exists {[] ?p []}
This returned the SDG props, so I wondered how are they used, eg
select * {
?x <http://metadata.un.org/sdg/ontology#isIndicatorOf> ?y
} limit 10
This shows they are used, not surprisingly, to describe more SDG stuff:
<http://metadata.un.org/sdg/C020102> sdg:isIndicatorOf <http://metadata.un.org/sdg/2.1>
But is SDG really used in SOA?
UPDATE: yes, Works are sometimes mapped to sdg:Goal.
Focusing on props in the SOA namespace first:
PREFIX soa: <https://semopenalex.org/ontology/>
PREFIX sh: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#>
PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
select ?p (group_concat(?class) as ?classes) ?kind {
values ?kind { owl:ObjectProperty owl:DatatypeProperty}
?p a ?kind
filter(strstarts(str(?p),str(soa:)))
optional {
?node sh:property/sh:path ?p; sh:targetClass ?cl
bind(strafter(str(?cl),str(soa:)) as ?class)
}
} group by ?p ?kind order by ?p
Ok, I wrote descriptions of all classes and props in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Cy4OWsBc2NqjKPJZXKkKjcRWO_S14fbknwwRMtsP1cU/edit. Too bad I didn't think of consulting https://docs.openalex.org/api-entities/! But I think all descriptions are factual and useful.
Also added a list of prefixes to be added to repo.
I know it's a drag, but you should add
rdfs:comment
for all ontology terms (properties and classes)soa:
terms, need to write new ones. If you make a google sheet, I'll help!bido:h-index
is defined at https://sparontologies.github.io/bido-standard-bibliometric-measures/current/bido-standard-bibliometric-measures.html#d4e215