Parse context account into instruction accounts

[zhmoly]

Hi, there I'm using solita as useful framework. By the way, I found some issue.

I'm using anchor and includes context into instruction.

#[derive(Accounts)]
pub struct SetSubModule<'info> {
    module_ctx: SetModule<'info>,

    #[account(mut)]
    pub signer: UncheckedAccount<'info>,
}

But when I try with Solita, get error.

Generating TypeScript SDK to /home/john/Documents/personal/unloc-contracts/client-generated/src/generated
/home/john/Documents/personal/unloc-contracts/client-generated/node_modules/@metaplex-foundation/solita/dist/src/render-instruction.js:92
      isWritable: ${isMut.toString()},
                          ^

TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'toString')
    at /home/john/Documents/personal/unloc-contracts/client-generated/node_modules/@metaplex-foundation/solita/dist/src/render-instruction.js:92:27

Is there any way to resolve this error? Any help will be appreciated.

Regards, John

[thlorenz]

Sorry it is really hart to parse what you're requesting.

Could you please properly format the code blocks as well as the error messages using github markdown features? See here.

Thanks

[roberts-pumpurs]

If I understood correctly, the issue that he's facing right now is that for some reason Solita is unable to parse the module_ctx: SetModule<'info> structure.

I am facing a similar issue, where I have a structure identified with #[derive(Accounts)], it has a field which is also attributed as #[derive(Accounts)]. Because of this field, Solita fails exactly as described in the original post.

[thlorenz]

OK I think I understand a bit better now. Could you please provide the IDL that solita is operating on when encountering those errors? And I assume that IDL is generated with anchor?

[thlorenz]

Hi, I cannot help you unless you provide some Rust code that reproduces the problem or the IDL that shank produced.

My guess is that shank trips on the life time 'info and fails to even generate the IDL, but without some sample code I'm left guessing.