Closed samuelvanderwaal closed 2 years ago
Hey,
There's no real disadvantage I see to everyone having sized collections by default
generally that's true and I prefer sized collections, but since the whole collection NFT concept seems to be hard to grasp for many unexperienced people I would prefer to at least add a parameter like --no-sized-collection
or something to instead create a unsized collection.
If we don't have that some quite annoying support cases will appear in the discord.
Hey,
There's no real disadvantage I see to everyone having sized collections by default
generally that's true and I prefer sized collections, but since the whole collection NFT concept seems to be hard to grasp for many unexperienced people I would prefer to at least add a parameter like
--no-sized-collection
or something to instead create a unsized collection.If we don't have that some quite annoying support cases will appear in the discord.
Can you elaborate on what kind of support cases you would anticipate from this?
Creates sized collections by default when a collection asset pair is included in the assets directory. There's no real disadvantage I see to everyone having sized collections by default, but if someone really doesn't want a sized collection they can still create the collection parent NFT themselves as unsized and then use the
set-collection
command with Sugar to use it.Waiting on this feature to be merged and deployed to candy machine devnet to test and finish this PR.