.. we already have something in the data returned by the API such that we could extract some field-related commands and now can e.g. cy.writeIntoLookupListField('M_Product_Category_ID', 'Z', 'Zwiebeln');
Which are the steps to reproduce?
What is the expected or desired behavior?
Goal: be able to develop a DSL with a bunch of robust metasfresh commands..
e.g.
openTab('M_ProductPrice')
openAction('M_Inventory_CreateCountLinesFromHU')
for this we imho need to have a standard field like internalName with which we annotate the layout data when creating it in the API.
Is this a bug or feature request?
FR
What is the current behavior?
.. we already have something in the data returned by the API such that we could extract some field-related commands and now can e.g.
cy.writeIntoLookupListField('M_Product_Category_ID', 'Z', 'Zwiebeln');
Which are the steps to reproduce?
What is the expected or desired behavior?
Goal: be able to develop a DSL with a bunch of robust metasfresh commands.. e.g.
openTab('M_ProductPrice')
openAction('M_Inventory_CreateCountLinesFromHU')
for this we imho need to have a standard field like
internalName
with which we annotate the layout data when creating it in the API.