Closed intsco closed 4 years ago
Another dataset appeared with this problem from a different user: 2019-04-25_16h19m44s (private)
Both imzML files had the following metadata:
<softwareList count="2">
<software id="Xcalibur" version="2.2">
<cvParam cvRef="MS" accession="MS:1000532" name="Xcalibur" value=""/>
</software>
<software id="TMC" version="1.1 beta">
<cvParam cvRef="MS" accession="MS:1000799" name="custom unreleased software tool" value=""/>
</software>
</softwareList>
<dataProcessingList count="2">
<dataProcessing id="XcaliburProcessing">
<processingMethod order="1" softwareRef="Xcalibur">
<cvParam cvRef="MS" accession="MS:1000594" name="low intensity data point removal" value=""/>
</processingMethod>
</dataProcessing>
<dataProcessing id="TMCConversion">
<processingMethod order="2" softwareRef="TMC">
<cvParam cvRef="MS" accession="MS:1000544" name="Conversion to mzML" value=""/>
</processingMethod>
</dataProcessing>
</dataProcessingList>
However, checking the other imzML files I have on hand, there are plenty of error-free imzML files that have the same versions of Xcalibur and TMC.
The only common thread - both of these datasets use 64-bit intensity values. All other Xcalibur v2.2 datasets that I have use 32-bit intensity values.
https://metaspace2020.eu/annotations?db=NPA-2019-08&ds=2019-11-18_12h37m23s