Closed frostedoyster closed 8 hours ago
Yes, it would be very cool. This means we have to store the architecture name in some way accessible in the checkpoint. I don't know if there is a way to do this without opening the model. But we can't open the model because this requires knowing its name.
As discussed in #352, we should probably remove the architecture from the export syntax, e.g.
mtt export model.ckpt
instead ofmtt export experimental.soap_bpnn model.ckpt
It would be more user-friendly